One of the articles purported to be a reprint of a speech
Congressman Lincoln made before the House of Representatives in 1848 condemning the War
with Mexico. It’s not unusual that a President of the United States would
condemn the war—in his autobiography Ulysses S. Grant, who served in the war
with distinction, said it was one of the greatest injustices a stronger country
could visit upon a weaker. What was unusual about the speech was something
Lincoln supposedly said about disaffected citizens rising up and throwing off their
government. The remarks were so contrary
to Lincoln’s position during the Civil War that I hardly credited the words as
coming out of the future President’s mouth. I went to the Collected Works of
Abraham Lincoln to verify that Lincoln actually spoke those words, and found that the article quoted him correctly.
Here’s what he said:
Any people anywhere, being inclined
and having the power, have the right to rise up, and shake off the existing
government, and form a new one that suits them better. This is a most valuable—a
most sacred right—a right, which we hope and believe, is to liberate the world.
Nor is this right confined to cases in which the whole people of an existing
government, may choose to exercise it. Any portion of such people that can, may
revolutionize, and make their own, of so much of the territory as they inhabit.
More than this, a majority of any portion of such people may revolutionize,
putting down a minority, intermingled with, or near about them, who may oppose
their movement. Such minority, was precisely the case, of the Tories of our own
revolution. It is a quality of revolutions not to go by old lines, or old laws;
but to break up both, and make new ones.
Lincoln apparently had changed his mind by the time the Southern
states began the process of trying to “rise up, and shake off the existing
government, and form a new one that suit[ed] them better.” If he hadn't changed his mind, there might not be a United States today.
Very interesting, Professor. Nothing like a deep dive into 150 year old state procedural statutes.
ReplyDelete